a people (as a congregated unit) · definite article + noun, common masculine singular absolute
removed
הֶעֱבִ֥ירhe.'e.Vir
H5674
to cross over · verb, hiphil perfect, 3rd person masculine singular
cities
לֶעָרִ֑יםle.'a.Rim
H5892
a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the wi… · preposition with the article + noun, common masculine plural absolute
end
מִקְצֵ֥הmik.Tzeh
H7097
an extremity · preposition + noun, common masculine singular construct
borders
גְבוּלge.Vul-
H1366
properly · noun, common masculine singular construct
Egypt
מִצְרַ֖יִםmitz.Ra.yim
H4714
Mitsrajim · proper noun, a place name
end
קָצֵֽהוּka.Tze.hu
H7097
an extremity · noun, common masculine singular construct + pronominal suffix, 3rd person masculine singular
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance (James Strong, 1890/1894), public domain; digitized by Open Scriptures (CC BY-SA). KJV word tagging: eBible.org (public domain). Original-language text, parsing and brief lexicon: STEPBible.org data from Tyndale House, Cambridge (CC BY 4.0).
Cross-references
Genesis 41:48 And he gathered up all the food of the seven years, which were in the land of Egypt, and laid up the food in the cities: the food of the fie…
Cross-references from OpenBible.info (CC BY), in the lineage of the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (public domain).
Commentary
Matthew Henry on Genesis 47:13-26
Care being taken of Jacob and his family, the preservation of which was especially designed by Providence in Joseph's advancement, an account is now given of the saving of the kingdom of Egypt too from ruin; for God is King of nations as well as King of saints, and provideth food for all flesh. Joseph now returns to the management of that great trust which Pharaoh had lodged in his hand. It would have been pleasing enough to him to have gone and lived with his father and brethren in Goshen; but his employment would not permit it. When he had seen his father, and seen him well settled, he applied himself as closely as ever to the execution of his office. Note, Even natural affection must give…
as for the people, he removed them to cities--obviously for the convenience of the country people, who were doing nothing, to the cities where the corn stores were situated.
Adam Clarke on Genesis 47:21
And as for the people, he removed them to cities - It is very likely that Joseph was influenced by no political motive in removing the people to the cities, but merely by a motive of humanity and prudence. As the corn was laid up in the cities he found it more convenient to bring them to the place where they might be conveniently fed; each being within the reach of an easy distribution. Thus then the country which could afford no sustenance was abandoned for the time being, that the people might be fed in those places where the provision was deposited.
John Gill on Genesis 47:21
And as for the people, he removed them,.... From the places where they dwelt, that it might appear they had no more property there, and might forget it, and be more willing to pay rent elsewhere; and their posterity hereafter could have no notion of its being theirs, or plead prescription; and besides, by such a removal and separation of the inhabitants of cities, some to one place, and some to another, sedition and mutiny might be prevented: he had them
to cities, from one end of the borders of Egypt, even unto the other end thereof; according to the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem, those that dwelt in provinces, or in country towns and villages, he removed to cities, and those that dwel…
The Church Fathers
According to the testimony of Scripture no Egyptian is free. For "Pharaoh reduced the people into servitude to himself" and left no one within the borders of the Egyptians free, but throughout the whole land of Egypt liberty was taken away. And perhaps it is for this reason that it is written: "I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." Egypt, then, has become a house of bondage, and — what is more unhappy — of voluntary bondage. For concerning the Hebrews, although it is reported that they were reduced into servitude and that they bore the yoke of domination with their liberty snatched away, they are nevertheless recorded to have been brought into this "by force." For it is written that: "The Egyptians abhorred the children of Israel, and the Egyptians by their power oppressed the children of Israel by force, and afflicted their life with hard labors, with clay and brick, and with all the works that were in the fields, in all of which they were reducing them into servitude with violence." Attend then more diligently, how the Hebrews are written to have been reduced "by force" into servitude — men in whom there was an inborn liberty, which was extorted from them not easily or through some deception, but with violence. Pharaoh, however, easily reduced the Egyptian people into servitude to himself, nor is it written that he did this with violence. For the Egyptians are prone to a degenerate life and quickly fall down into every enslavement to vices. Look back to the origin of their race and you will find that their father Ham, who had laughed at his father's nakedness, deserved a sentence of this kind, that his son Canaan should be a servant to his brothers, so that in him the condition of servitude might convict the wickedness of his morals. Not without reason, then, does the discolored posterity imitate the ignobility of the race. But the Hebrews, even if they are reduced into servitude, even if they suffer tyranny from the Egyptians, suffer it "by force" and by necessity. Therefore they are freed "from the house of bondage" and are recalled to their former liberty, which they had lost against their will. Finally it is even provided by the divine laws that, if perchance someone should buy a Hebrew boy, he should not possess him in perpetual servitude, but that he should serve him for six years, and in the…
If, then, we understand these things spiritually — what the servitude of the Egyptians is — we recognize that to serve the Egyptians is nothing other than to become liable to carnal vices and to be subject to demons. Into which, certainly, no necessity brought in from without compels anyone, but the sluggishness of the mind and the lust and pleasure of the body subdues him, to which the mind subjects itself through slothfulness. But he who takes care for the liberty of his soul and ennobles the dignity of his mind with heavenly thought, this man is of the children of Israel. He, even if he be oppressed "by force" for a time, does not nevertheless lose his liberty forever. Finally our Savior too, discoursing in the Gospel about liberty and servitude, speaks thus: "everyone," he says, "who sins is a slave of sin." And again he says: "if you abide in my word, you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." But if perchance someone should say to us: how then, through Joseph, is all the land handed over into Pharaoh's possession, and all this servitude, which we expounded above as taken on from the condition of sin, is said to be ministered to Pharaoh through a holy man? — we can answer to these things that the very word of Scripture excuses the ministry of the holy man, when it says that the Egyptians sold themselves and their possessions. The fault, then, is not reflected back upon the one who dispenses, where things worthy of the recipients' merits are provided. For you will find something of the kind done even by Paul, when by him the man who, through the foulness of his deeds, made himself unworthy of the fellowship of the saints is handed over to Satan, "that he may learn not to blaspheme." In which certainly no one would say that Paul acted harshly, who cast the man out of the church and handed him over to Satan. But without doubt the fault is referred to that man who by his own deeds deserved this, that there should be no place for him in the church, but that he should deserve to be joined to the fellowship of Satan. So then Joseph also, since he saw nothing of Hebrew liberty, nothing of Israelite nobility in the Egyptians, joined worthy servitudes to a worthy dominion. I say even something more. You will find in the divine dispensations also that something of the kind was done, in that which Moses says: "when the Most High divided the…
Dictionary and topics
Egypt · .The king acquires title to land of — .The king acquires title to land of
Extortion · (grain) — (grain)
Land · Monopoly of — Monopoly of
Monopoly · By Pharaoh — By Pharaoh
Statecraft · .Joseph — .Joseph
Usurpation · and per — and per
Dictionary: Easton's (1897) and Smith's (1863), public domain. Topics: Nave's Topical Bible (1896) and Torrey's Topical Textbook (1897), public domain. Both as parsed by NEUU (CC BY 4.0).
And as for the people, he removed them to cities. This removal was, indeed, severe; but if we reflect how much better it was to depart to another place; in order that they might be free cultivators of the land, than to be attached to the soil, and employed as slaves in servile work; no one will deny that this was a tolerable, and even a humane exercise of authority. Had each person cultivated his field, as he had been accustomed to do, the exaction of tribute would have seemed to be grievous. Joseph, therefore, contrived a middle course, which might mitigate the new and unwonted burden, by assigning new lands to each, with a tribute attached to them. The passage may, however, be differently…
To make the extent of the benefit conferred by Joseph upon his family, in providing them with the necessary supplies during the years of famine, all the more apparent, a description is given of the distress into which the inhabitants of Egypt and Canaan were plunged by the continuance of the famine.
Gen 47:13
The land of Egypt and the land of Canaan were exhausted with hunger. - ותּלהּ: from להה = לאה, to languish, to be exhausted, only occurring again in Pro 26:18, Hithp. in a secondary sense.
Gen 47:14
All the money in both countries was paid in to Joseph for the purchase of corn, and deposited by him in Pharaoh's house, i.e., the royal treasury.
Gen 47:15-17
When the money was exhausted,…
he made them all slaves: In Hebrew script, the difference is very slight between slaves (Hebrew ‘abadim) and towns (Hebrew ‘arim). Moving the people into the towns doesn’t fit the context very well, so most translations select slaves as the reading that makes the most sense (cp. 47:20).
Rashi on Genesis 47:21
ואת העם העביר AND AS FOR THE PEOPLE HE CAUSED THEM TO PASS — Joseph caused them to pass from one city to another city that they might be reminded that they now had no claim to the land. He settled the people of one city in another. There was no need for Scripture to state this except for the purpose of telling you something to Joseph’s credit — that he intended thereby to remove a reproach from his brothers because, since the Egyptians were themselves strangers in the various cities where they then dwelt, they could not call them (Joseph’s brethren) strangers (Chullin 60b).
'מקצה גבול מצרים וגו means thus did he to all the cities of the realm of Egypt FROM ONE EXTREMITY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF…