a son (as a builder of the family name) · noun, common masculine plural construct
Israel
יִשְׂרָאֵ֔לYis.ra.'El
H3478
Jisrael · proper noun, a place name
strong
חָֽזְקוּ֙cha.ze.Ku
H2388
to fasten upon · verb, qal perfect, 3rd person common plural
put
וַיִּתְּנ֥וּvai.yi.te.Nu
H5414
to give · conjunction + verb, qal sequential imperfect, 3rd person masculine plural
Canaanites
הַֽכְּנַעֲנִ֖יha.ke.na.'a.Ni
H3669
a Kenaanite or inhabitant of Kenaan · definite article + noun, gentilic masculine singular absolute
tribute
לָמַ֑סla.Mas
H4522
properly · preposition + noun, common masculine singular absolute
utterly
וְהוֹרֵ֖שׁve.ho.Resh
H3423
to occupy (by driving out previous tenants · conjunction + verb, hiphil infinitive absolute
out
הוֹרִישֽׁוֹho.ri.Sho
H3423
to occupy (by driving out previous tenants · verb, hiphil perfect, 3rd person masculine singular + pronominal suffix, 3rd person masculine singular
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance (James Strong, 1890/1894), public domain; digitized by Open Scriptures (CC BY-SA). KJV word tagging: eBible.org (public domain). Original-language text, parsing and brief lexicon: STEPBible.org data from Tyndale House, Cambridge (CC BY 4.0).
Cross-references
Joshua 16:10 And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer: but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites unto this day, and serve under tri…
Philippians 4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Deuteronomy 20:11-18 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be t…
Judges 1:28 And it came to pass, when Israel was strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute, and did not utterly drive them out.
Judges 1:30 Neither did Zebulun drive out the inhabitants of Kitron, nor the inhabitants of Nahalol; but the Canaanites dwelt among them, and became tri…
Judges 1:33 Neither did Naphtali drive out the inhabitants of Beth-shemesh, nor the inhabitants of Beth-anath; but he dwelt among the Canaanites, the in…
Judges 1:35 But the Amorites would dwell in mount Heres in Aijalon, and in Shaalbim: yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed, so that they became…
2 Samuel 3:1 Now there was long war between the house of Saul and the house of David: but David waxed stronger and stronger, and the house of Saul waxed…
Cross-references from OpenBible.info (CC BY), in the lineage of the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (public domain).
Commentary
Matthew Henry on Joshua 17:7-13
We have here a short account of the lot of this half tribe. It reached from Jordan on the east to the great sea on the west; on the south it lay all along contiguous to Ephraim, but on the north it abutted upon Asher and Issachar. Asher lay north-west, and Issachar north-east, which seems to be the meaning of that (Jos 17:10), that they (that is, Manasseh and Ephraim, as related to it, both together making the tribe of Joseph) met in Asher on the north and Issachar on the east, for Ephraim itself reached not those tribes. Some things are particularly observed concerning this lot: - 1. That there was great communication between this tribe and that of Ephraim. The city of Tappuah belonged to E…
CANAANITES NOT DRIVEN OUT. (Jos 17:12-13)
Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out those cities--probably due to indolence, a love of ease. Perhaps a mistaken humanity, arising from a disregard or forgetfulness of the divine command, and a decreasing principle of faith and zeal in the service of God, were the causes of their failure.
Adam Clarke on Joshua 17:12
Could not drive out, etc. - They had neither grace nor courage to go against their enemies, and chose rather to share their territories with those whom the justice of God had proscribed, than exert themselves to expel them. But some commentators give a different turn to this expression, and translate the passage thus: But the children of Manasseh could not (resolve) to destroy those cities, but the Canaanites consented to dwell in the land. And as they were willing to pay tribute, and the others chose to tolerate them on those terms, they agreed to dwell together: but this paying of tribute seems not to have taken place till some time after, when the children of Israel were waxen strong, etc…
Yet it came to pass, when the children of Israel were waxed strong,.... Increased in numbers, and became superior to the Canaanites, not only those of the tribe of Manasseh, but of the other tribes also:
that they put the Canaanites to tribute; they did not take away their lives, as they were commanded to do, but made them tributaries to them, which seems to arise from a covetous disposition, and done for the sake of gain:
but did not utterly drive them out; which they were ordered to do, and could now have done; for if they were able to make them pay tribute to them, they had power sufficient to drive them out, or destroy them, and therefore broke the commandment of God, Deuteronomy 7:1.
The Church Fathers
After Ham had been cursed through his one son, [Noah] blessed Shem and Japheth and said, "May God increase Japheth and may he dwell in the tent of Shem, and let Canaan be their slave." Japheth increased and became powerful in his inheritance in the north and in the west. And God dwelt in the tent of Abraham, the descendent of Shem, and Canaan became their slave when in the days of Joshua son of Nun, the Israelites destroyed the dwelling-places of [Canaan] and pressed their leaders into bondage.
Let us see, then, now, what this threefold narrative concerning the Canaanites means. First, the "Canaanite" is indeed with us and is "under tribute," yet he is not obedient to us nor a "servant." Second, he is made even a "servant" and obedient. Let us here take the Canaanite as our flesh, or the things that belong to the flesh. This is first with us, that is, it is joined to the soul, but it is not obedient to it, except only that it "pays tribute," that is, it does indeed furnish the service of doing or moving something, "yet it lusts against the spirit" and is not obedient to the soul, but yields to its own desires. But if we have now made some progress, the flesh "is made" for us a "servant" and obedient, and submitting to the will of the soul; and this is the second progress of the soul, when it has made the flesh both obey it and serve it. The third, however, is that which is perfect. For if we now come to the perfect, the "Canaanite" is said to be "exterminated" by us and handed over to death. But how this is fulfilled in our flesh, hear the Apostle saying: "mortify your members which are upon the earth, fornication, uncleanness," and the rest that follows. And again he says: "but they who are Christ's have crucified their flesh with its vices and lusts." So then, thirdly, that is, when we come to perfection and "mortify our members" and "carry about the death of Christ in our body," the "Canaanite" is said to be "exterminated" by us.
The "Canaanites" are said, for the third time, to be among the sons of Ephraim. But let us observe what is the order of these statements in each case, that is, what the first statement contains, which says that the Canaanites were with the sons of Ephraim, and what the second and the third contain. For if we observe more carefully how the Canaanites are said to be with the sons of Ephraim for the third time, then, by the Lord's help, we shall be able to investigate the order of the statements — what is reported to have been done from this in the first, what in the second, what in the third — and I think we shall not be unbelieving that these things were truly written not merely that the narrative of the deeds should be handed down to us by itself, but that they were filled with divine mysteries worthy of God. First, then, it was said that: "Ephraim did not destroy the Canaanite who dwelt in Gazer; but the Canaanite dwelt in Ephraim until this present day, and he was made a servant under tribute, until Pharaoh king of Egypt came up and took the city and burned it with fire, and slew the Canaanites and the Perizzites and those who dwelt in Gazer; and Pharaoh gave it as a dowry to his daughter." Second: "and it came to pass," it says, "when the sons of Israel had grown strong, that they made the Canaanites subject, but by extermination they did not exterminate them." Third, when the men of the tribe of Ephraim "contradicted Jesus," wishing, according to their multitude — because they were many and strong — to receive also a greater portion of the inheritance, and they are commanded to "go up into the forest" and make more room for themselves; and, that they might be able to occupy wider spaces, they are commanded to "exterminate the Canaanite."
Dictionary and topics
Gibeon — Hill-city, “one of the royal cities, greater than Ai, and all the men thereof were mighty” (Josh. 10:2). Its inhabitants were Hivites (11:19). It lay within the territory of Benjamin, and became a…
Lord — There are various Hebrew and Greek words so rendered. (1.) Heb. Jehovah, has been rendered in the English Bible LORD, printed in small capitals. This is the proper name of the God of the Hebrews. The…
Canaanites · Not expelled — Not expelled
Manasseh, The Tribe Of · Could not drive out the Canaanites but made them tributary — Could not drive out the Canaanites but made them tributary
Dictionary: Easton's (1897) and Smith's (1863), public domain. Topics: Nave's Topical Bible (1896) and Torrey's Topical Textbook (1897), public domain. Both as parsed by NEUU (CC BY 4.0).
John Calvin on Joshua 17:11–end
Joshua 17:11-18
11. And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Bethshean and her towns, and Ibleam and her towns, and the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Endor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Taanach and her towns, and the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns, even three countries.
11. Fuitque ipsi Manasse in Issachar, et in Aser, Beth-sean, et oppida ejus: et Ibleam, et oppida ejus: et habitatores Dor, et oppida ejus: et habitatores Endor, et oppida ejus: et habitatores Thaanach, et oppida ejus: et habitatores Magiddo, et oppida ejus, tres regiones.
12. Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities; but the Canaanites would…
The inheritance of Manasseh on this side of the Jordan was on the north of Ephraim.
Jos 17:1-6
Before proceeding to the more detailed description of the inheritance, the historian thinks it necessary to observe that the Manassites received a double inheritance. This remark is introduced with the words "for he was the first-born of Joseph." On this account, in addition to the territory already given to him in Gilead and Bashan, he received a second allotment of territory in Canaan proper. With the word למכיר (for Machir) the more minute account of the division of the Manassites commences. וגו למכיר is first of all written absolutely at the beginning of the sentence, and then resumed in לו ויה…
Throughout the period of the judges and beyond, the Israelites gradually grew stronger and the Canaanite people weaker. After the time of Joshua, the Israelites forced the Canaanites to work as slaves. They eventually absorbed these people and were influenced to worship the Canaanite gods. This idolatry ultimately cost them the land.
Rashi on Joshua 17:12
Resolved—were willing.5The tribe of Menashe set a bad precedent by taxing the Canaanites instead of destroying them as the Torah commanded. This evil practice was soon adopted by the other tribes. Even though the tribe of Ephraim also did not drive out the Canaanites (see above 16:10), they at least forced them into slave labor, whereas the tribe of Menashe demanded only a money tax. This was considered a graver sin as it allowed these Canaanites the ability to influence the Jews much more than those who were actually enslaved.